Hillary Clinton, a twice-failed Democratic presidential candidate, decided to weigh in on the second assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, for some strange reason believing that any of us on either side of the political divide actually care about what she has to say. Clinton stated that despite the potential danger divisive rhetoric could be placing the former president in, she wants to see journalists need to “have a consistent narrative about how dangerous Trump is.”
It’s almost like she’s hoping that these attempts keep happening and that one of them is successful. But what about being inclusive and tolerant? I thought that was the whole foundation for the radical left’s utopian dreams for the country? I guess they will be tolerant so long as everyone is a hive mind and participating in groupthink.
via The Daily Wire:
Clinton made the remarks after authorities in Florida arrested 58-year-old Ryan Routh — a Democrat donor with a criminal historythat barred him from owning firearms — on Sunday after he hid on Trump International Golf Course West Palm Beach for 12 hours armed with an AK-17.“And I don’t understand why it’s so difficult for the press to have a consistent narrative about how dangerous Trump is,” Clinton, who lost to Trump in 2016, lamented to far-Left MSNBC host Rachel Maddow.
“The late, great journalist, Terry Evans, one time said that journalists should really try to achieve objectivity,” she further explained on the program. “And by that, he said, I mean, they should cover the object. Well, the object in this case, is Donald Trump, his demagoguery, his danger to our country and the world. And stick with it.”
One day after another assassination attempt of Trump.
"I don’t understand why the press struggles to maintain a consistent narrative about how dangerous Trump is…his demagoguery and his danger to our country and the world.”
— Will Cain (@willcain) September 17, 2024
Trump campaign national press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to the remarks by posting on X: “We look forward to every MSM journalist asking Kamala Harris if she denounces this violent rhetoric from Hillary Clinton less than 48 hours after President Trump almost got assassinated (for the second time) because of rhetoric like this.”
Tim Murtaugh, a senior adviser for the Trump campaign, responded to Clinton’s remarks saying, “This is evil. The day after Trump survived a second assassination attempt, Hillary Clinton is out trying to stir up a third one.”
Max Abrams, an international security professor, agrees with Murtaugh, saying referring to Clinton’s comments as an example of “stochastic terrorism.”
“Hillary is the person most responsible for the Russia collusion hoax which did more to discredit America’s main institutions (media, intel agencies, Congressional committees) than anything else,” he elaborated. “If not going to be president, she was going to burn America down.”
Elon Musk, billionaire owner of X, said the former secretary of state’s statements were “troubling.”
Senior Trump adviser Stephen Miller posted on X: “This rhetoric is reprehensible. It is dangerous, reckless, vile, demented and unhinged.”
But will anyone in the mainstream media hold this woman accountable for the venom she is spitting at our former president? Of course not. No one will. Because it’s perfectly acceptable to foment violence as long as it is done for the greater good of the progressive agenda.